The Political Meaning of Informal Urbanisation: building democracy while building the city

RC21 Leeds : September 11-13, 2017Rethinking Urban Global Justice: An international academic conference for critical urban studiesCall for PapersHomeImportant DeadlinesAbout LeedsContactRegistrationRC 21 SUMMER SCHOOLThe Political Meaning of Informal Urbanisation: building democracy while building the cityThis session explores the intersections between informal urbanization processes (also known as self-help urbanism) and politics, particularly the political struggles associated with rapid modernization, rapid urbanization and rural to urban migration, in which disenfranchised citizens seek to find a place in the city and acquire a political voice.

Democracy’s success depends not only on the ability of formal institutions to respond to the legitimate demands and rights of its citizens, but it also depends on how these citizens are able to enter the political realm in order to formulate demands and claim their political rights. In this sense, informal urbanisation is not only a problematic and unsustainable way to urbanise, but also a step for the formulation of legitimate demands and to the inclusion of citizens in the realm of politics. By this token, processes of informal urbanisation might lead to the affirmation of civil rights, to the reinforcement of the rule of law, to the inclusion of citizens in formal institutions and processes and might therefore result in the formalisation of the built environment. Along the way, however, informality may lead to conflict and oppression, as informal dwellers have initially very little rights and are most commonly in breach of the law when they build their dwellings in property that does not belong to them.

The path to true citizenship is long and sinuous. The questions we wish to address are:Does informal urbanisation help perpetuate economic and political exclusion, or can it eventually lead to inclusion?What are the limits of negative and positive rights? In other words: Should planning reward entrepreneurship and self-reliance or should it emphasise citizens’ positive rights, such as the right to adequate dwelling?What are the contradictions between self-reliance and positive rights?How is informal urbanization politically instrumentalised, both by informal dwellers themselves and by governments? To what ends?

Roberto Rocco, TU Delft

Jan van Ballegooijen, TU Delft

Source: The Political Meaning of Informal Urbanisation: building democracy while building the city


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.